Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) was an
English critic, poet and novelist who was well known as one of the most
colourful and provocative writers of his day. He was seen by many as a
latter-day Samuel Johnson, not only for his common sense and incisive wit, but
also for his physically large appearance.
“The Invisible Man” was the fifth story
written by G K Chesterton about his priest/detective Father Brown. It appeared
in his original collection of Father Brown stories, entitled “The Innocence of
Father Brown”, in 1911.
The Story
The setting of the story is Camden Town, a
district of north London. A young man, John Turnbull Angus, walks into a café
and proposes marriage to the waitress, Laura Hope, who appears to be the only
member of staff on the premises. One assumes that the two are not complete
strangers to each other, but this is not made clear. She turns him down but,
because he refuses to take no for an answer, she tells him the story of her
complicated love-life.
She had been living at her father’s pub,
The Red Fish, which was somewhere out of town, when she had been the subject of
marriage proposals from two suitors, neither of whom she found attractive. One
was a very short man, almost a dwarf, named Isidore Smythe. The other, tall and
thin but with a terrible squint, was James Welkin. Laura did not want to marry
either of them, but neither did she want to hurt their feelings, so she came up
with the plan of announcing that she could not marry anyone who had not made his
way in the world. The two men promptly set off to seek their fortunes as if, in
Laura’s words, “they were in some silly fairy-tale”.
A year has passed, and Laura is now running
the café but in real fear that she has been tracked down by James Welkin, the
suitor with the squint. She keeps hearing his voice when there is no-one to be
seen. She has received letters from Isidore Smythe, who is a now successful
businessman, but as she reads the letters she can hear Welkin’s distinctive
laugh.
Angus hears a noise in the street and walks
through into the confectioner’s shop that adjoins the café to find a man who
can only be Isidore Smythe. He points out that a strip of paper has been pasted
on the shop window bearing the message “If you marry Smythe he will die”. Smythe
also mentions that he has had threatening letters left at his flat, but nobody
has seen anyone who could have brought them. Angus offers to help Smythe, and
Laura, by putting the matter into the hands of a private detective that he
knows and who lives nearby. He is Flambeau, a reformed former French master criminal
who is a character that appears in many of the Father Brown stories.
Angus escorts Smythe back to his flat,
which is on the top floor of Himalaya Mansions. On the way he notices billboard
advertisements for the product that has made Smythe his fortune, namely large
clockwork dolls that perform household duties under the general name of
“Smythe’s Silent Service”.
When they reach Smythe’s flat, Angus
notices that the place is full of these machines that perform their functions
at the touch of button. He also sees a scrap of paper on the floor with a
message that reads: “If you have been to see her today, I shall kill you”.
Angus heads off to fetch Flambeau, but
before he leaves he instructs four people, a cleaner, a commissionaire, a
policeman and a chestnut seller, to keep a close eye on the premises and report
back to him if anyone enters the building while he is away.
Angus finds Flambeau, who is being visited
by Father Brown. As the three of them walk back to Himalaya Mansions it starts
to snow. On arrival, Angus hears from all four “guards” that nobody has entered
the building in his absence, but Father Brown is not so sure, because he can
see footprints in the snow that tell a different story.
When
they reach Smythe’s flat they find a bloodstain on the floor but no
Smythe. Back on ground level, Father Brown asks the policeman to investigate
something on his behalf, and when he returns he says that Smythe’s body has
been found in the nearby canal. Father Brown then regrets that he forgot to ask
if a light brown sack has also been found.
The solution of the mystery revolves around
the fact that, according to Chesterton and Father Brown, people tend to observe
only what they expect to regard as being out of the ordinary. Nobody saw anyone
enter Himalaya Mansions, although they would all have seen the postman do so
but dismissed this occurrence because it was unremarkable. A postman does not
count as a person in such a context.
As a postman, James Welkin was able to
deliver all the letters and messages to Laura and Isidore Smythe, and to take
away the latter’s small body in his postman’s sack. Laura could hear Welkin’s
voice but not see Welkin himself, because the voice was remarkable but a
postman doing his rounds was not. The murderer was invisible because he was all
too visible, being as much a part of the background scenery as the trees and
the houses. Even the sight of a postman leaving the building with a sack that
was fuller than when he entered was apparently not sufficiently out of the
ordinary to attract attention.
Does it work?
It’s a reasonable thought on which to hang
a story, but does it really stand up to scrutiny? One thing to bear in mind is
that this story was written in Edwardian England when the class system held
sway and everyone with any money employed servants to perform menial tasks for
them. Chesterton hints at this very strongly with his description of Smythe’s
mechanical servants who line the walls until called into service to perform a
specific task. There is a telling line here in that they are described as “only
automatic machines and nobody would have looked at them twice”. This would have
been how many middle-class people regarded their human servants.
However, even if the reader is willing to
accept that a middle-class person could regard a postman as an invisible public
servant, does this really work in the scenario of the story? The people who are
asked to keep a lookout are not middle-class but working-class, and of the same
social status as a postman. Would a cleaner or chestnut seller really allow a
postman to be invisible in the same way that a much wealthier householder
would? The commissionaire actual states that he would ask any man, “duke or
dustman”, what his business was on entering the building, but would he really
have made a distinction between a dustman and a postman in this regard, even to
the extent that the latter was
“invisible” to him?
It is on this point of class distinction
that the story rests in terms of its acceptability to the reader. It is
probably true to say that it would have been read differently by its original
readers in class-ridden England than by members of today’s much more classless
society.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment