The knight is
one of only three Canterbury pilgrims (the others being the parson and the ploughman)
whom Chaucer treats without a hint of irony in his General Prologue. Indeed,
these three characters are more like nostalgic idealizations of people whom Chaucer
greatly admired, but they are figures of a bygone age, much to the writer’s
regret.
In the case
of the knight, this admiration is no great surprise, because Chaucer himself was
in royal service for most of his life, although his duties were more to do with
diplomacy (perhaps even espionage) than fighting. However, he would have mixed
with and known the knightly class at first hand, and had no reason to disparage
the men who defended the monarchy of which he himself was such a devoted
servant.
The medieval
knight developed into the gentleman, and it is no accident that the word “courteous”
has the same root as “courtly”, and that the royal court was peopled by knights
who maintained, for example, the tradition of “courtly love” by which women
were admired from afar and received tokens of love and pledges to defend their
honour, even if they gave no sign of returning the affection.
There is no
prologue to the Knight’s Tale, unless one counts the last few lines of the
General Prologue. These state that the host decides who shall tell the first
tale by the drawing of lots, and the knight literally draws the short straw.
This meets with general approbation, and so the knight begins his tale.
The Knight’s
Tale
The tale is,
as might be expected, a chivalric romance, although it should more accurately
be seen as a mixture of medieval romance and classical epic. The knight himself
states that he is telling a classical tale, but Chaucer’s source was the
Italian poet Boccaccio, whom he follows very closely although far more concisely.
Despite this contraction, Chaucer also added fresh material, so only about a
third of the tale can be regarded as a direct translation of Boccaccio’s
version. The tale was not originally written by Chaucer as a Canterbury Tale,
but adapted from an earlier work and given the knight’s “voice” in its new
context.
Part One
The pilgrims
certainly get their money’s worth with the opening tale, which runs to four
parts and some 2,250 lines. The scene is set in Ancient Greece, with Theseus,
having defeated the Scythians, returning to Athens with his new queen,
Hippolyta, and her sister Emily, when they are met by the widows of knights
slain and dishonoured by Creon of Thebes, against whom Theseus swears vengeance.
Sending Hippolyta and Emily on to Athens , he
immediately sets off towards Thebes .
Defeating and
slaying Creon takes little effort on the part of Theseus, and the bodies of the
Athenians dishonoured by Creon are given proper funeral rites, but two badly wounded
Thebean knights are also discovered and brought to Theseus. These are Arcite
and Palamon, who are two young cousins. Theseus orders that they be taken to Athens and imprisoned
there.
Time passes,
the two knights recover from their injuries, but are locked up in a tower from
which they have no hope of release. One May morning, Palamon sees the lady
Emily walking in the garden beneath the tower and immediately falls in love
with her, as does Arcite when he in turn sees Emily. However, Palamon claims
that Emily is his, because he saw her first. Arcite will have none of it,
claiming that his love is more worthy than Palamon’s. Of course, this is all
nonsense, because neither of them has any hope of actually meeting the lady in
question. However, within the rules of courtly love, love at such a distance is
every bit as valid as that of “real” lovers, and is indeed more honourable.
The story
takes a fresh turn when Arcite is ransomed by an old friend, who was also a friend
of Theseus. However, the condition of the ransom is that he must leave Athens , the penalty for
returning being death. He is therefore, despite being free, further removed
from Emily than is Palamon, who can still see her from his prison window.
Meanwhile,
Palamon also bewails his fate, for he is still imprisoned while Arcite is free.
In Palamon’s eyes, Arcite is in a position to raise an army with which to
defeat Theseus and claim Emily for his own, although this is not something that
had occurred to Arcite. The teller then poses the question to his hearers, as
he concludes the first part of the tale, which of the two is in the worse
position?
Part Two
Part Two
opens with Arcite, back in Thebes, pining away for “a year or two” when he has
a dream in which Mercury, the messenger of the Gods, tells him to go back to
Athens, because everything will turn out for the best if he does. On the
strength of this dream, Arcite does so, reckoning that his wretched appearance,
caused by his failure to look after himself properly, will render him
unrecognizable in Athens .
He also adopts a further disguise, as a poor labourer. He is therefore able to
get a job in Emily’s household, under a false name, for another “year or two”.
Arcite does
his job so well that he is promoted, and eventually becomes squire to Theseus.
He is able to become prosperous, especially as his income from Thebes is also smuggled to him, although he
takes care to spend it “honestly and slyly”. Another three years pass.
Meanwhile,
Palamon has been imprisoned for seven years. He manages to escape, with the
help of a friend, and plans to return to Thebes
to raise an army, as he had expected Arcite to do. However, on the first night
he lies low in a wood, to which, coincidentally, Arcite rides out the next
morning. Palamon overhears him bemoaning aloud that Emily is as far from him as
ever, which prompts Palamon to break his cover and confront his long-separated
cousin.
The two now
declare themselves to be mortal foes and vow to fight to the death for the hand
of Emily. Palamon, having just escaped from prison, has no weapon or armour,
but Arcite promises to return the next day with “harness” for Palamon so that
they can fight on equal terms. Knightly honour prompts both of them to settle
their differences in the prescribed manner. Arcite even promises to allow
Palamon the choice of weapons – “leave the worst for me” – and to bring him food,
drink and bedding for the night before the duel.
The following
morning, Arcite keeps his promise and the fight begins, on equal terms.
However, they are interrupted by Theseus, who is out hunting, accompanied by
Hippolyta and Emily and the whole court. The cousins admit that they are the
banished Arcite and escaped prisoner Palamon, and that they deserve to die, but
are spared when the women present plead their cause, as they are fighting over
a matter concerning love.
Theseus
considers their plea and agrees that love is such a powerful thing that it can
excuse almost anything done in its name. He pardons the cousins, on condition
that they cease their conflict for the time being. However, he commands them to
return to Athens
in a year’s time, each with a hundred knights, to fight a pitched battle with
Emily as the prize to the winner. Everybody seems pleased with this decision,
although it might be pointed out that this is the first time that Emily has had
the slightest inkling that she has been the cause of so much bother, and her
wishes on the matter are never sought.
Part Three
The third
part of The Knight’s Tale opens with details of the vast amphitheatre that
Theseus builds in which the battle between the armies of Arcite and Palamon for
the hand of Emily is to be held. This is a circular arena, “a mile about”,
surrounded by terraced stands and with marble entrance ways, plus temples to
Mars, Venus and Diana. These are described in detail, and at such length that
the tale takes a back seat.
Palamon and
Arcite arrive, each with their company of knights, and there are long
descriptions of each. After a feast hosted by Theseus, the two rivals go to
pray at the temples built near the amphitheatre. Palamon prays to Venus,
pleading that she will look with favour on him, whose cause is love; Arcite
prays to Mars, the god of war; and both of them receive signs that they will be
triumphant.
However, in
between these two prayers, Emily herself offers a prayer, at the temple of
Diana, the goddess of chastity. This is the first time that we have heard Emily
speak, and her prayer is that she may retain her virginity, as she has no wish
to be the wife of anyone. However, if she has to go through with this, can she
at least be given to the one who will love her the more truly? Diana herself
appears to Emily, and tells her that she cannot have her first wish.
The scene now
changes to the realm of the gods, where Venus and Mars argue over which of them
shall prevail. Saturn intervenes, to state that Venus, and thereby Palamon,
shall be the winner, which rather spoils the story for anyone wondering how it
will turn out in the end.
Part Four
Part Four
begins with preparations for the battle, including the stipulations of Theseus
that he hopes will avoid a bloodbath, basically by restricting the types of
weapon that may be used and setting certain rules of engagement by which
defeated warriors are captured rather than killed. Should either Arcite or
Palamon die or be captured, then the battle will be ended at that point.
Eventually,
battle commences, and quite a lot of blood does indeed flow, despite the
precautions of Theseus. Palamon is captured and Theseus declares that Arcite
has won. However, this does not please Venus and Saturn, who causes Arcite to
be thrown from his horse as he goes to claim Emily as his prize, and he is
seriously injured.
With the
battle done, the armies are patched up and sent home – with no fatalities.
However, things do not go so well for Arcite, and it becomes clear that he is
dying. Before he dies, he says farewell to Emily and declares that Palamon will
be a good husband to her.
The
lamentations and funeral rites for Arcite are then described at some length,
with the pyre being built at the site where the two knights first fought.
More years
pass, and Theseus summons Palamon and Emily to his court, where he, in effect,
preaches a sermon on the mutability of life. Chaucer tends to confuse pagan and
Christian theology at this point, referring to “Jupiter” in one line and “God”
in another. However, the end result is that he gives his blessing to the union
of Emily and Palamon, and they both live happily ever after.
Assessing the
Knight’s Tale
So what can
we make of this, the first of the Canterbury Tales? To the modern reader an air
of unreality hangs over it, mainly because the convention of courtly love is so
foreign to us. Indeed, even in Chaucer’s time it was something that belonged to
the past. However, to his contemporary audience, Chaucer’s story would not have
sounded as ridiculous as it might sound to us.
Even so,
there are problems with it as a narrative. As mentioned earlier, Chaucer cut
back on Boccaccio’s version but made additions of his own. The pace of the
story is greatly helped by the omission of Boccaccio’s lengthy description of
the defeat of Creon’s Thebes
by Theseus, for example. But the pace is also slowed by the hundreds of lines
devoted to the descriptions of the temples and Theseus’s sermon, which owed
nothing to Boccaccio. As listeners, we feel cheated at being made to wait so
long for the story to develop in the third and fourth parts.
There are
other flaws, including the almost total lack of characterization – it is hard
to picture Arcite and Palamon as individuals distinct from each other, for
example. The treatment of Emily as a character also leaves us cold. Her desires
are barely touched upon, and when they are, they are ignored by the goddess to
whom she turns for help. There is far less sympathy shown for her plight than
there is, for example, for “patient Griselda” in the later Clerk’s Tale. Chaucer
was in general quite sympathetic towards the female characters in his tales,
but not here.
All in all,
the Knight’s Tale offers a reasonable start as the opening tale, although there
are better things to come.
© John
Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment